Edexcel A-Level Politics 9PL0 · Paper 1 UK Politics · Content area 6 of 6

6. Voting behaviour and the media

6.1 long-term factors and dealignment · 6.2 short-term factors and rational choice · 6.3 case-study elections · 6.4 the media and opinion polls.

← All areasPurple = thinker · Orange = example

Every bar below is a drop-down and starts closed. Click one to open it.

Progress

6.1 Long-term factors and dealignment Done

Essential The slow-moving social facts about a voter - class, age, region, ethnicity and party loyalty - and how the link between class and party has weakened over time.

The specification

6.1The long-term factors that shape how people vote

Long-term factors are the social characteristics a voter carries: social class, age, region, ethnicity and inherited party loyalty. I can do this

Class dealignment is the weakening of the link between social class and the party a person votes for. I can do this

Partisan dealignment is the decline of lifelong loyalty to one party, which leaves more floating voters. I can do this

Wording above follows the Pearson specification. Tick a line only when you could answer on it without notes.

Past questions - how it has been examined

Directly: Sample Q2b (social factors determine voting behaviour) is the standard long-term-factors essay.
As the framing: 2024 Q2b (election outcomes are mostly determined by particular factors) and 2026 Q1a (class and region remain important; source) both turn on how the long-term factors work.

Pattern. The board keeps asking whether one long-term factor still dominates. Prepare a line on class against age as the leading influence.

What examiners reward and penalise

Stronger answers show that the long-term factors have shifted in importance - class once led, but age is now the sharpest divide - rather than treating class as fixed.
Weaker answers quote Pulzer's old claim that class is the basis of British politics and stop there, missing the dealignment that followed.

One way to get high marks

Credited: class dealignment means a voter's class no longer predicts their party as it once did, so the master factor of 1945 to 1992 has lost its grip.
Rewarded evidence: the 1979 swing of skilled workers to the Conservatives, the record age gap of 2019, and the scrambled regional map of 2024.
Level 5 over Level 4: judges which long-term factor now leads (age, on recent evidence) and links partisan dealignment to the rise of the short-term factors, instead of listing each factor in turn.

The 30-mark questions. Marks split 10/10/10 across AO1 (knowledge), AO2 (analysis) and AO3 (evaluation), so an answer that describes without judging throws away a third of the marks. Examiners reward a clear and consistent line of argument: decide your view before you write, argue it in every paragraph, weigh the counter-argument as you go, and reach a substantiated judgement. A one-sided essay is capped at Level 2 however much it knows, and you should structure by theme rather than as a list of examples. On the Question 1 source question you must use the source - compare the two opposing views it contains and judge between them; ignoring the source caps the answer.

Open any past question linked above to read its full mark scheme and examiner report in the Question Bank.

Arguments and counter-arguments

Are long-term social factors still the main driver of how people vote?

Yes

Point. Age has become the single sharpest predictor of party choice. Explanation. The young lean heavily to Labour and the old to the right, a divide that decides large numbers of seats. Example. In 2019 the youngest voters backed Labour while the over-65s backed the Conservatives, the widest age gap in modern polling. Evaluation. This shows a long-term factor still leads, even though the leading factor has changed from class to age.
Point. Ethnicity remains a stable and powerful influence. Explanation. Voting patterns by ethnic background have held firm across decades regardless of the campaign. Example. Non-white voters have leaned strongly to Labour at every election since the 1970s, with only modest recent slippage. Evaluation. A factor this durable is hard to explain by short-term events alone.

No

Point. Class dealignment has hollowed out the old social model. Explanation. A voter's class no longer fixes their party, so the factor that once explained most results explains far less. Example. In 2019 working-class Leave seats went Conservative while middle-class Remain cities went Labour, reversing the post-war pattern. Evaluation. This is a strong objection, because the strongest single social predictor has broken down.
Point. Partisan dealignment has freed more voters to be swung. Explanation. Fewer lifelong loyalists means more floating voters who decide late on the campaign and the leaders. Example. The scale of the swings in 2019 and 2024 would have been impossible when most voters were tied to a party for life. Evaluation. This shows the short-term factors now do work the long-term ones used to do.

Best judgement. Long-term factors still shape voting, but the leading one has changed from class to age, and dealignment means the short-term factors now decide more of the result than they once did.

Using it in essays

30-mark: social-factors and class-against-age questions (Sample Q2b, 2026 Q1a).
Topic sentence: "Long-term factors still anchor voting, but age has replaced class as the sharpest divide, and dealignment has weakened the social model overall."
Final judgement: long-term factors matter, but the dominant one is now age, not class.

Practise this on PantherVoting behaviour notes Voting behaviour walk-through

Wider context

Helpful context (background, not a spec requirement)

A useful frame for any long-term factor is to ask whether its pull is getting stronger or weaker over time. Class is fading, age is rising, and region has been scrambled rather than simply weakened - which sorts the factors by direction of travel.

Examination priority

Important Learn class against age as the headline debate. It powers the social-factors essay and feeds straight into the short-versus-long question.

6.2 Short-term factors and rational choice Done

Essential The forces of the final weeks - the issues, the leaders, the economy and the campaign - plus the idea that voters weigh up competence and choose rationally.

The specification

6.2The short-term factors that shape how people vote

Short-term factors are the issues, leaders, economic conditions and campaign events of a particular election. I can do this

Valence voting means choosing on judgements of governing competence rather than on class or ideology. I can do this

Rational choice means a voter weighs the costs and benefits on offer and votes for what serves them best. I can do this

Wording above follows the Pearson specification. Tick a line only when you could answer on it without notes.

Past questions - how it has been examined

Directly: Sample Q2a (elections are lost by governments, not won by oppositions) is a valence question about competence.
As the framing: 2023 mocks Q2a (outcomes influenced more by one factor than another) and 2024 Q2b (what mostly determines outcomes) both test short against long-term factors.

Pattern. Expect a question on whether the campaign, the leaders or the economy decides results. Prepare a valence line built around governing competence.

What examiners reward and penalise

Stronger answers treat valence as the key short-term idea - voters reward or punish perceived competence - and use leaders and the economy as evidence for it.
Weaker answers describe a list of campaign events without linking them to the underlying judgement on competence that drives a valence verdict.

One way to get high marks

Credited: partisan dealignment is what gives the short-term factors their power, because more floating voters means more people deciding late on issues and leaders.
Rewarded evidence: the Get Brexit Done message and Corbyn's record-low ratings in 2019, and the Truss legacy and time-for-a-change mood in 2024.
Level 5: argues that valence now leads, while conceding the long-term factors still set each party's possible range, rather than asserting the campaign decides everything.

Open any past question linked above to read its full mark scheme and examiner report in the Question Bank.

Arguments and counter-arguments

Do short-term factors now decide UK general elections?

Yes

Point. Valence judgements on competence now swing results. Explanation. Voters reward a party that looks capable and punish one that looks chaotic, regardless of their background. Example. In 2024 the Truss mini-budget legacy and a wider time-for-a-change mood produced the strongest competence verdict against a government since 1997. Evaluation. This shows a short-term judgement can drive a landslide on its own.
Point. Leaders and the dominant issue can decide the outcome. Explanation. A weak leader or one overriding issue can move enough late deciders to settle the election. Example. In 2019 Corbyn's ratings were the lowest on record and Brexit dwarfed every other issue, both cited as decisive in fallen seats. Evaluation. This is a strong case where one short-term factor towers over the rest.

No

Point. The deep social patterns still set each party's range. Explanation. Long-term factors fix the floor and ceiling of a party's support, and campaigns mostly move voters within it. Example. Ethnic-minority and age-based patterns held firm in 2019 and 2024 whatever the campaign threw at them. Evaluation. This shows the short-term factors work inside limits the long-term ones draw.
Point. Campaign effects are real but often modest. Explanation. A campaign can set or collapse a frame, but most voters have already chosen before it begins. Example. The 2024 Conservative campaign was widely seen as chaotic, yet it confirmed rather than created a defeat the polls had long predicted. Evaluation. This suggests the campaign reveals the verdict more than it makes it.

Best judgement. Short-term valence factors now decide more results than they once did, but they operate inside the range the long-term factors set, so the honest answer is that the two work together rather than one alone.

Using it in essays

30-mark: short-against-long and competence questions (2023 mocks Q2a, Sample Q2a).
Topic sentence: "Short-term valence factors increasingly decide elections, but only within the range the long-term social factors set."
Final judgement: short-term factors lead at the margin; long-term factors set the limits.

Practise this on PantherVoting behaviour notes Four elections pack

Wider context

Helpful context (background, not a spec requirement)

The neatest link between the two sides of this topic is that partisan dealignment, itself a long-term change, is exactly what hands the short-term factors their power. Make that point and the short-versus-long debate stops being a tug of war and becomes a single story.

Examination priority

Important Lock in valence as the key idea and 2024 as the headline example. This is half of the most-set debate in the area.

6.3 Case-study elections Done

Important Four elections - 1979, 1997, 2019 and 2024 - mined not as stories but as evidence for why people vote as they do.

The specification

6.3Case-study elections and what they show

The spec requires three case studies: one from 1945 to 1992, the 1997 election, and one since 1997. I can do this

Each election is used to evidence the long-term and short-term factors, not to be narrated in turn. I can do this

A realignment is a lasting shift of voter groups between parties, such as 1997 or 2019. I can do this

Wording above follows the Pearson specification. Tick a line only when you could answer on it without notes.

Past questions - how it has been examined

Directly: 2025 Q2b (with reference to at least three general elections) asks for the case studies by name.
As the framing: 2023 Q1a (in 1997 the election was won or lost; source) and 2019 Q1a (what determines outcomes; source) both rest on the case-study elections.

Pattern. A question that names a minimum number of elections is recurring. Prepare four elections you can mine for factor evidence, not retell.

What examiners reward and penalise

Stronger answers use each election as a quarry for factor evidence - 1979 for class and the press, 1997 for gender and the Murdoch switch, 2019 for age, 2024 for valence.
Weaker answers narrate three elections in date order, which examiners mark down because it lists rather than argues.

One way to get high marks

Credited: the same election can serve more than one theme, so 2024 evidences valence, turnout and the scrambled regional map at once.
Rewarded evidence: the 1979 skilled-worker swing and Right to Buy, the 1997 women's move to Labour and the bandwagon polling, the 2019 record age gap and Red Wall, and the 2024 valence landslide with the lowest turnout since 2001.
Level 5: builds each theme from evidence across several elections and reaches a verdict, rather than touring the elections one by one.

Open any past question linked above to read its full mark scheme and examiner report in the Question Bank.

Arguments and counter-arguments

Are election outcomes mostly determined by the campaign of the day?

Yes

Point. A disciplined message can win the campaign. Explanation. A simple, repeated frame can corral floating voters in the final weeks. Example. Get Brexit Done in 2019 was credited by canvassers as the message that delivered the Red Wall seats. Evaluation. This shows the campaign can be decisive when one frame dominates, though it had a long-term Leave realignment to build on.
Point. A campaign can collapse a government's standing. Explanation. Visible errors in the final weeks can confirm a verdict of incompetence. Example. The 2024 Conservative campaign, with the rain-soaked launch and the D-Day departure, deepened an existing collapse. Evaluation. The effect is real, but it amplified a defeat the polls had long shown.

No

Point. The deep social map decides most seats before the campaign. Explanation. Long-standing patterns of age, region and ethnicity fix the likely result in most constituencies. Example. The 1997 women's shift to Labour and the 2019 age gap were structural, not products of a single campaign week. Evaluation. This shows the campaign works at the margin of a map drawn long before.
Point. The competence verdict often sets in years earlier. Explanation. A reputation for chaos can be fixed long before polling day, leaving the campaign to confirm it. Example. The 2022 Truss mini-budget shaped the 2024 result almost two years ahead of the vote. Evaluation. This shows the decisive judgement can be made well before the campaign begins.

Best judgement. The campaign can be decisive when one frame dominates, but it usually confirms a verdict the long-term factors and the competence judgement set well in advance, so it shapes the margin more than the map.

Using it in essays

30-mark: at-least-three-elections and what-determines-outcomes questions (2025 Q2b, 2024 Q2b).
Topic sentence: "The case-study elections show outcomes are set mainly by long-term patterns and competence judgements, with the campaign deciding the margin."
Final judgement: mine the elections for themes; the campaign shapes the margin, not the map.

Practise this on PantherFour elections pack Voting behaviour walk-through

Wider context

Helpful context (background, not a spec requirement)

Treat each election as a set of evidence cards rather than a chapter to be summarised. Tag 1979 to class and press, 1997 to gender and the Murdoch switch, 2019 to age and leadership, 2024 to valence and turnout, and you can answer any factor question by reaching for the right cards.

Examination priority

Important Have four elections ready to mine for evidence, each tagged to the factors it best illustrates. Never narrate them.

6.4 The media and opinion polls Done

Essential Whether the media moves votes or merely reflects them, across press, broadcast and social media, plus the role and record of opinion polls.

The specification

6.4The role and impact of the media and opinion polls

The press is free to take sides; broadcast must be impartial by law; social media is lightly regulated. I can do this

Studies suggest the media mainly reinforces existing views rather than converting voters wholesale. I can do this

Opinion polls can shape campaigns through the bandwagon effect and tactical voting, and have a mixed accuracy record. I can do this

Wording above follows the Pearson specification. Tick a line only when you could answer on it without notes.

Past questions - how it has been examined

Directly: 2021 Q2b (the influence of the media in politics) is the standard media-influence essay.
As the framing: 2020 Q1a (a person's age and the media; source) sets the media against the long-term factors directly.

Pattern. The media question pits the media against a rival - other factors, the parties, or its own newer half. Prepare a reinforcement-not-conversion line.

What examiners reward and penalise

Stronger answers claim the media reinforces and frames rather than converts, and weigh it against the bigger rivals of class, age, region and the electoral system.
Weaker answers assume newspaper endorsements simply change minds, ignoring that a paper's stance may reflect its readers rather than lead them.

One way to get high marks

Credited: the distinction between reinforcement and conversion - the media confirms existing choices more than it creates new ones - is the sharpest available AO3 move.
Rewarded evidence: the Sun backing the winner at realignment elections (Conservative 1979, Labour 1997 and again 2024), broadcast neutrality by law, social media reaching low-turnout younger voters in 2019 and 2024, and the bandwagon and tactical-voting effects of polls.
Level 5: argues the media frames and reinforces while the deep factors and the electoral system decide, and brings in the between-elections agenda-setting power most answers miss.

Open any past question linked above to read its full mark scheme and examiner report in the Question Bank.

Arguments and counter-arguments

Does the media have more influence on outcomes than any other factor?

Yes

Point. The media is how voters receive political information. Explanation. The way an issue is framed, and any built-in bias, shapes what voters notice and worry about. Example. The Sun has backed the winner at every realignment election, switching to Labour in 1997 and again in 2024. Evaluation. However, backing the winner may show the press reads the public as much as leads it.
Point. Social media now reaches voters the older outlets cannot. Explanation. Targeted online campaigning reaches younger, lower-turnout groups directly. Example. Reform UK's social media strength in 2024 matched the personal coverage of its leader and helped it take vote share from the Conservatives. Evaluation. Yet reach is not the same as changed minds, and the youngest voters still turn out least.

No

Point. The deep social factors outweigh the media. Explanation. Class, age, region and ethnicity move far less than the changeable media and anchor most voters' choices. Example. The 2019 age gap and the durable ethnic-minority lean to Labour held whatever the press did. Evaluation. This is a strong objection, because these patterns are more stable than any media effect.
Point. The electoral system shapes outcomes more than coverage. Explanation. First past the post turns votes into seats in a way no newspaper controls, deciding who governs. Example. In 2024 Reform won a large vote share but very few seats, while the system handed Labour a landslide on a modest share. Evaluation. This shows the rules of the count can matter more than the media that precedes it.

Best judgement. The media frames issues and reinforces existing views, but the deep social factors and the electoral system decide outcomes, so the media is an influence on results rather than the main driver of them.

Using it in essays

30-mark: media-influence and media-against-the-factors questions (2021 Q2b, 2020 Q1a).
Topic sentence: "The media frames and reinforces voting choices, but the deep social factors and the electoral system, not the media, decide who wins."
Final judgement: reinforcement not conversion; the media shapes the debate but the factors and the system decide.

Practise this on PantherMedia notes Opinion polls pack

Wider context

Helpful context (background, not a spec requirement)

A clear test for any media claim is to ask whether it is reinforcing what a voter already thinks or actually converting them to a new view. Almost all the credible evidence sits on the reinforcement side, which is exactly why the careful claim scores so well.

Examination priority

Important Carry the reinforcement-not-conversion line and the list of bigger rivals. This is the most-set media question and a frequent source-question topic.

Test Section test - 12 questions

Twelve mixed questions covering the whole area. Your most recent score shows in the top bar.

Practise this topic on Panther

Voting notes Voting walk-through Four elections pack Media notes Opinion polls pack Voting quiz

← Electoral systems