🏠 Home Detailed notes Detailed notes Strand comparison All judgement grids

How to use this

Two grids on the same template. The first is empty - print it, fill in each cell with a one-line note while you revise. The second is a worked example to check yourself against.

Each cell asks one question: does this row strengthen the column quality (mark +) or weaken it (mark -)? Then add a one-line note saying why. The plus and minus columns are deliberately not pre-printed - your judgement is the work.

Civic nation = is the nation a civic community you choose to join? Rational human nature = is human nature rational and progressive? Universal self-rule = should every nation have an equal right to rule itself? Cooperate, not dominate = should nations cooperate as equals rather than dominate? Civic, non-supreme state = is the state a civic vehicle rather than supreme over the individual? Inclusive route = is the nation reached by inclusive, peaceful means?

Nationalism strands - judgement grid +   -

Empty version. Print and fill in.
Strand+   - Civic nation Rational human nature Universal self-rule Cooperate, not dominate Civic, non-supreme state Inclusive route
Liberal
Conservative
Expansionist
Anti-colonial
How to use the grid in an essay. Pick the column the question asks about, read down it across the rows, and judge where they agree and where they differ.

Nationalism strands - judgement grid +   -

Filled version. Use this to check your own grid - and tap any cell for the full detail behind the judgement.
Strand+   - Civic nation Rational human nature Universal self-rule Cooperate, not dominate Civic, non-supreme state Inclusive route
Liberal +Strongly holds: the nation is a chosen political community of shared values (Rousseau, Mazzini). +Strongly holds: rational and progressive; people choose their governing authority (Rousseau). +Strongly holds: a universal right, every nation deserves a state (Mazzini). +Strongly holds: sovereign nations cooperate as equals - liberal internationalism (Mazzini). +Strongly holds: a civic nation-state all can join, not supreme over the individual (Mazzini). +Strongly holds: inclusive and peaceful, by consent and self-determination, not force.
Conservative -Rejects: the nation is cultural and inherited, bound by language and tradition (von Herder). -Rejects the rational view: humans are pessimistic and security-seeking (von Herder). ±Mixed: backs self-rule for one's own nation, but not as a universal right for all. -Rejects: inward-looking and cool towards cross-border cooperation; the nation is the limit. ±Mixed: a romantic embodiment of culture, neither civic nor an oppressive imperial master. -Rejects: the nation is bound by cultural exclusion, not open inclusive membership.
Expansionist -Rejects: the nation is exclusive, sometimes racially defined, not a voluntary civic body. -Rejects the rational view: chauvinist superiority over other nations (Maurras). -Rejects it as universal: denies self-rule to weaker peoples in order to dominate (Maurras). -Rejects: chauvinist supremacy and imperial domination, not cooperation between equals (Maurras). -Rejects the non-supreme civic state: the state is supreme and the individual subservient (Maurras). -Rejects inclusive means: militarism, conquest and force build the nation (Maurras).
Anti-colonial ±Mixed: civic and inclusive by shared experience, but also reasserts suppressed culture (Garvey). +Strongly holds: rational and progressive; the equal moral worth of all peoples (Garvey). +Strongly holds: nations have the right to govern themselves free from domination (Garvey). +Strongly holds: pan-national solidarity across borders, such as Garvey's pan-Africanism. +Strongly holds: the nation-state as a vehicle of liberation, not an oppressive master (Garvey). +Strongly holds: inclusive liberation on the basis of shared experience, not ethnic purity.
What the filled grid shows. Read down each column to see which rows score plus, mixed or minus - the pattern that drives the judgement.
See also