Skip to content 🕑 Interactive timeline: US Congress: power and gridlock, 1868 to todayOpen →
Politics Panther · Paper 3 USA

US Congress: the foundations

Paper 3 USA · notes + four exercises

Practise on this material

Why this matters for Paper 3

Paper 3 (USA) regularly leans on the basics of Congress: the numbers, the term lengths, the article numbering and the way each branch checks the other two. Once these are cold-recall, every essay paragraph gets faster and tighter because we are not searching for the structural fact mid-sentence.

1. The two chambers, side by side

House of RepresentativesSenate
Members435 (fixed since 1929)100 (two per state)
Term2 years6 years
RefreshAll 435 every 2 yearsA third up every 2 years
ApportionmentBy population (redrawn every 10 years)Two per state regardless of population
ArticleArticle 1Article 1

The named undemocracy contrast: Wyoming (around 580,000 people) and California (around 39 million) both get exactly two senators. That single fact does most of the AO2 work in any "Senate is undemocratic" paragraph.

Exam point. The "undemocratic Senate" line in one fact: Wyoming and California both get two senators. Reach for it whenever a question asks if Congress represents people fairly.

2. The three branches, source-of-power map

BranchSource of powerArticleHeadline power
President
Executive
Mandate from being elected every 4 years Article 2 Commander-in-chief; appoints Supreme Court justices
Supreme Court
Judiciary
The Constitution Article 3 Strike-down: voids any presidential or congressional act that breaches the Constitution
Congress
Legislature
Elected (FPTP, heavily distorted) Article 1 Passes legislation; Senate confirms Supreme Court appointments

This table is the single most useful thing to commit to memory from this topic. Three rows, three branches, three articles - everything else on the paper hangs off it.

Exam point. Each branch draws power from a different source, which is why none fully controls another. Cite the article numbers (1, 2, 3) to anchor any checks-and-balances answer.

3. Redistricting, gerrymandering and the Voting Rights Act

House districts are redrawn every ten years after the Census. In the United States, the body that draws them is the state legislature - which means the maps are openly partisan. In the United Kingdom the equivalent job is done by an independent Boundary Commission, which is the cleanest comparative point to drop into any "checks and balances" answer.

The federal guardrail on the worst gerrymandering has been the Voting Rights Act 1965. Recent Supreme Court rulings have weakened it case by case, which is the legal reason Trump's 2026 redistricting push - more Republican-favourable maps in several states - has a realistic path through.

Senate seats cannot be gerrymandered because the boundary is the state itself. That is why Republican focus is on the House.

Judgement point. With the Voting Rights Act weakened case by case, the main federal guardrail on gerrymandering has thinned, so US map-drawing is far more partisan than the UK independent Boundary Commission.

4. The incumbency effect

Senators serve six years. In their first four years they tend to vote with the public mood; in the final two they get visibly more responsive because re-election is in sight. The flip side is that six years of name recognition makes them very hard to unseat in the first place, which is what the incumbency effect describes.

House members are running constantly, so they never quite escape campaign mode. That is the structural reason the House is more responsive to short-term sentiment - and the reason Trump's House majority of one is so fragile heading into 2026.

Exam point. Incumbency makes Congress hard to unseat, cutting against the "Congress is responsive" claim - but House members, always campaigning, are the responsive exception.

5. Why Trump worries about the 2026 midterms

  • Majority of one in the House currently, after illness, resignations and scandals among Republican members.
  • Iran war has pushed fuel to around $4.50 a gallon - American voters punish high fuel prices in almost every recent midterm cycle.
  • Federal fuel tax is only 18 cents per gallon, so removing it would barely move the price. Trump cannot tax-cut his way out.
  • Redistricting push is the structural counter-move: redraw more Republican-favourable House maps before the vote.
Exam point. Use 2026 as live evidence of the President leaning on Congress: a one-seat House majority means Trump governs on a knife-edge.

6. Named cases worth keeping in your back pocket

  • Wyoming vs California - Senate undemocracy in one line.
  • Voting Rights Act 1965 - the federal blocker on extreme gerrymandering.
  • Boundary Commission (UK) - the independent comparator on map-drawing.
  • Garland (blocked) and Kavanaugh (confirmed) - both illustrate the Senate's confirmation power over Supreme Court appointments.
  • Trump's 2026 House majority of one - the live midterm-vulnerability example.
Use it. Garland (blocked) and Kavanaugh (confirmed) are the cleanest pair for the Senate confirmation power over Supreme Court appointments.