🏠 Home Detailed notes Comparative theory walk-through All judgement grids

How to use this

Two grids on the same template. The first is empty - print it, fill in each cell with a one-line note while you revise. The second is a worked example to check yourself against.

Each cell asks one question: does this row strengthen the column quality (mark +) or weaken it (mark -)? Then add a one-line note saying why. The plus and minus columns are deliberately not pre-printed - your judgement is the work.

States are the key actors = are states the dominant actors? Anarchy drives behaviour = does anarchy itself dictate how states act? Durable cooperation = is lasting cooperation possible? Institutions and law = do institutions and rules shape outcomes? Human nature pessimistic = is a grim view of human nature the driver? Ideas shape interests = do ideas and identity decide what states want?

Global political theories - judgement grid +   -

Empty version. Print and fill in.
Theory+   - States are the key actors Anarchy drives behaviour Durable cooperation Institutions and law Human nature pessimistic Ideas shape interests
Realism
Liberalism
English School
Constructivism
How to use the grid in an essay. Pick the claim the question turns on, read down the theories, and contrast how realism and liberalism divide on it.

Global political theories - judgement grid +   -

Filled version. Use this to check your own grid - and tap any cell for the full detail behind the judgement.
Theory+   - States are the key actors Anarchy drives behaviour Durable cooperation Institutions and law Human nature pessimistic Ideas shape interests
Realism +states are the dominant actors; billiard balls in anarchy +anarchy is the bedrock condition shaping all behaviour -cooperation is possible but limited and power-contingent -institutions reflect power; the EU is a problem case ±classical realism yes; neo-realism roots it in structure -interests come from power and structure, not identity
Liberalism -states are not the only actors; IGOs, NGOs, MNCs matter -anarchy does not prevent cooperation +cooperation is durable through institutions and trade +institutions reduce transaction costs and constrain states -the order is improvable, not fixed by grim human nature ±regime type matters, but mechanisms are material
English School +a society of states; non-state actors underweighted ±anarchical but also a society, so order coexists with anarchy +ordered coexistence rests on shared rules and consent +five institutions: law, diplomacy, balance of power and more -rejects the Hobbesian state of nature framing ±norms and shared understanding matter, but it is state-centric
Constructivism ±states act, but identities and norms are the real focus -anarchy is what states make of it ±cooperation depends on the culture of anarchy in play ±norms matter and can cascade, but ideas come first -no fixed human nature; behaviour follows belief +interests flow from identity; Zeitenwende the case
What the filled grid shows. Read down each claim: realism and liberalism sit at opposite ends on cooperation and institutions, with the English School and constructivism in between.
See also