Skip to content
Paper 1 UK Politics · Voting behaviour and the media (spec P1.4.1 + P1.4.2)

Voting behaviour and the media · Notes

Sub-topic lookup view of the walk-through.

About these notes. This is the sub-topic lookup version. For the narrative scrollytelling lesson with the factor, election and media figures, use the Walk-through. For active recall, use the MCQ Quiz. The full election case studies live in the Four Elections pack, and polling in depth lives in the Opinion Polls pack. The cards below cover the long-term and short-term factors, dealignment, turnout, the case-study elections, the media debate and the exam method.

Likely exam angles. The 30-marker lands on one of three debates: age versus class as the most important influence (the signature post-2017 question); short-term versus long-term factors; or the media against the other factors (the 2022 mocks Q2a and 2020 Q1a questions). Each one is covered in the cards below.

1. The framework - CAGER, CLIMP and dealignment

Two kinds of explanation for every result. Long-term factors (CAGER) - Class, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Region - are the slow-moving social facts about a voter. Short-term factors (CLIMP) - Campaign, Leadership, Issues, Manifesto, Press and polls - drive the final weeks.

  • Class dealignment: the weakening of the link between social class and party choice - visible from the 1979 C2 swing, extreme by 2019, deeper still in 2024.
  • Partisan dealignment: the decline of lifelong party loyalty since the 1970s. More floating voters means more late deciders - which is what gives the short-term factors their power.
  • Valence: voting on judgements of governing competence rather than class or ideology. 2024 - the Truss legacy and 'time for a change' - is the strongest valence verdict since 1997.
The exam frame. Pulzer's line - class is the basis of British politics, all else is embellishment - is the starting point every answer departs from. The story of the topic is what happened after the line stopped being true.

2. The long-term factors one by one

FactorThe old patternThe new pattern
ClassAB/C1 Conservative, C2/DE Labour - the master predictor of 1945-92. First crack: the 1979 C2 swing (41% of skilled workers Conservative, up 11 points, helped by Right to Buy).Fragmented. 2019: working-class Leave seats went Conservative, middle-class Remain cities Labour. 2024: working-class voters split Labour/Reform, middle-class Labour/Lib Dem.
AgeA small Conservative lean among older voters - barely a factor in 1979.The dominant divide. 2019: under-25s around 57% Labour, over-65s around 62% Conservative - the largest gap in modern polling. 2024: tipping point around 50.
GenderWomen marginally more Conservative for decades - even under a female Conservative leader in 1979.Reversed in 1997, when women moved decisively to Labour. Since 2017 a slight Labour lean; Reform under-performed with women in 2024. Always a modest gap.
EthnicityNon-white voters roughly 80% Labour in 1979.Still heavily Labour - around 64% to 20% Conservative in 2019 - but with internal variation: Hindu voters less Labour-leaning since 2019, further Conservative slippage among South Asian voters in 2024.
RegionNorth-South divide formed in 1979, structural by 1983 - Labour confined to industrial heartlands.Scrambled. 2019: Red Wall fell, Scotland went SNP (48 of 59). 2024: Scotland turned Labour (37 of 57), the Red Wall mostly returned, the Conservatives squeezed into a southern blue wall, Reform won Clacton and a handful of northern and coastal seats.
The turnout layer. 76% in 1979; 71% in 1997, where the long decline began; 67.3% in 2019; 60.0% in 2024 - the lowest since 2001. Turnout is lower among young, working-class and ethnic-minority voters, which is why the 2020 mark scheme's caveat matters: age by itself is an insufficient guide, because a preference that does not vote does not decide elections.

3. The short-term factors - CLIMP in action

  • Campaign. Can set the frame months out - the Saatchi and Saatchi 'Labour Isn't Working' poster ran from August 1978. Can collapse in weeks - the Conservatives' 2024 campaign: the rain-soaked announcement, the D-Day departure, the betting scandal.
  • Leadership. The sharpest valence measure. Thatcher re-made for television (1979) against an exhausted Callaghan; Corbyn's 2019 ratings the lowest since YouGov records began, cited by Red Wall canvassers as the decisive factor; 2024 - Starmer's personal ratings low but ahead of Sunak on 'would make a good PM'. Valence is relative.
  • Issues. Decisive when one dominates: trade union power (1979), Brexit (2019 - 'Get Brexit Done'), and in 2024 the NHS, the cost of living, immigration and the Conservative chaos verdict.
  • Manifesto. Matters most when it misfires: Labour 1983 - nationalisation, EEC withdrawal, unilateral disarmament - 'the longest suicide note in history'; Labour 2019 - free broadband and large-scale nationalisation seen as too radical even by sympathetic voters.
  • Press and polls. Polls drive tactical voting and party resource decisions - the Lib Dems' 2024 southern gains relied heavily on tactical-voting polling. Full polling detail in the opinion polls pack.
The short-versus-long debate. For short-term: dealignment means more floating voters, so competence, leaders and campaigns swing results - 2024 was a valence landslide. Against: the deep patterns still set each party's possible range, and campaigns mostly move voters within it. The linking point: partisan dealignment is itself a long-term change - it is what gives the short-term factors their power.

4. The case-study elections

Spec point P1.4.1.a: three case studies - one from 1945-92, the 1997 election, and one since 1997.

ElectionResultWhat it proves
1979Con 339 / 43.9%; Lab 269 / 36.9%; majority 43; turnout 76%Class still ruled but the C2 swing began the working-class drift. Winter of Discontent; 'Labour Isn't Working'; The Sun backed the Conservatives decisively for the first time.
1983Con 397 / 42.4%; Lab 209 / 27.6%; Alliance 23 / 25.4%; majority 144; turnout 72.7%Manifesto misfire ('the longest suicide note in history'); Falklands leadership effect; the Alliance's 25.4% returning 23 seats - FPTP punishing spread support.
1997The Blair landslide - the compulsory case studyThe New Labour realignment. Women moved decisively to Labour for the first time; gaining The Sun was pivotal (2022 mocks MS); the months of landslide polling confirmed by the result is the bandwagon evidence; turnout (71%) starts the long decline.
2019Con 365 / 43.6%; Lab 202 / 32.1%; SNP 48 / 3.9%; majority 80; turnout 67.3%Brexit as the single dominant issue; record age gap; extraordinary class realignment (Leave seats Conservative, Remain cities Labour); the Red Wall fell; Corbyn's record-low ratings.
2024Lab 411 / 33.7%; Con 121 / 23.7%; LD 72 / 12.2%; Reform 5 / 14.3%; majority 174; turnout 60.0%The valence landslide: the Truss legacy and 'time for a change'. Scotland turned Labour after the SNP collapse; Reform split the Conservative coalition; The Sun backed Labour for the first time since 1997; the lowest turnout since 2001.
How to use them. Never narrate an election - mine it for factor evidence. 1979 for class and the press; 1983 for manifestos; 1997 for gender, the bandwagon and the Murdoch switch; 2019 for age and leadership; 2024 for valence and turnout. Full Events / Significance / CAGER / CLIMP panels in the four elections pack.

5. The media - press, broadcast, social

The press - free to take sides

The Murdoch press is the standard case: The Sun backed the Conservatives decisively in 1979; gaining its support was pivotal for Labour in 1997, as it was for Conservative fortunes in 2010 and through the 1980s (2022 mocks MS); in 2024 it backed Labour for the first time since 1997. Counter: newspaper choice may reflect the reader's views rather than alter them (2020 MS), and press primacy has been eroded by social media, broadcast and word-of-mouth.

Broadcast - neutral by law

Television and radio must be neutral by law, yet the 2022 mocks mark scheme insists their importance cannot be overestimated in a world of personality and sound bites - a slip on broadcast media can be fatal. Cases: Thatcher's television coaching (1979); Foot unable to project authority in the broadcast age (1983); Sunak's D-Day departure running for days in 2024.

Social media - targeted and growing

Reaches the younger, lowest-turnout voters the press cannot (2022 mocks MS). 2019: Conservative dominance of Facebook ad spend with micro-targeting in Red Wall seats. 2024: Reform UK's social media strength matched the personal coverage of Farage. Counter: targeted reach is not turnout, and 18-24 turnout remains the lowest of any group.

The verdict to argue. Studies cited in the 2022 mocks mark scheme find the media confirms and maintains existing electoral choices - reinforcement, not conversion. The disagreement column lists the bigger rivals: class and social background models, gender, age and region, the manifesto offer, and the electoral system itself as the biggest factor in outcomes. Strong line: the media frames and reinforces; the deep factors and the system decide.

6. Opinion polls - the cross-link

Polls belong to this topic through spec point P1.4.2.a - their importance and relevance during and between elections. The essentials to carry:

  • Effects on campaigns: the bandwagon effect (1997 - months of landslide polling confirmed by the result), tactical voting (the Lib Dems' 2024 southern gains), party resource allocation and press narrative.
  • The failures: 1992 (the 'shy Tory' thesis), 2015 (the Sturgis Inquiry blamed sampling bias), 2017 (conventional polls missed the late surge that YouGov's MRP caught).
  • The recoveries: the 2019 and 2024 exit polls were highly accurate (2019: predicted majority 86, actual 80; 2024: predicted 170, actual 174).
Go deeper. Poll types, methodology, herding, margin of error and the regulation debate are all in the opinion polls pack - cross-linked, not repeated here.

7. Exam method - how the 30-marker is scored

  • Marks: 30, split AO1 10 / AO2 10 / AO3 10. The topic appears at Q1 (source) or Q2 (essay).
  • Two views, weighed. Balance means both views are weighed - not that the answer fence-sits. A one-sided answer is capped at Level 2.
  • Themes, not elections. Structure by factor or debate, using the elections as evidence inside each theme. A chronological tour of three elections is the structure examiners mark down.
  • Pair the points. Each paragraph pairs an argument with its opposing argument and ends with an interim judgement on your side.
  • Carry the turnout caveat. The 2020 mark scheme builds it in: any demographic claim is incomplete without asking whether the group votes.
  • Use post-2024 evidence. Contemporary examples are preferred, and for 2026 sittings the 2024 election material is essential.
  • Conclusions justify. Answer the question with reasons; do not list the paragraph themes again.
Questions to plan. 2020 Q1a: age and the media replacing class and region? 2022 mocks Q2a: outcomes influenced more by the media than any other factor? The age-versus-class question and the short-versus-long-term question. A worked 30-mark answer on age replacing class is at the end of the walk-through.
📜 Walk-throughThe narrative scrollytelling lesson with figures, mini-quizzes and the worked essay. 🧠 MCQ quiz15 questions across the factors, the elections and the media. 🗳️ Four elections pack1979, 1983, 2019 and 2024 in full. 📊 Opinion polls packPolling types, failures and the regulation debate.