Skip to content
Paper 3 · Global Politics · Regionalism

Regionalism and the EU, 1952 to today

European integration deepened from the ECSC to the euro and eastern enlargement, then hit reverse with Brexit - while new blocs like AUKUS show regionalism beyond the EU. The exam question: is regional integration deepening or stalling?

The arc at a glance

1952ECSC formed
1957Treaty of Rome
1992Maastricht creates EU
1999-2002Euro launched
2004Eastern enlargement
2007Bulgaria and Romania
2009Lisbon expands QMV
2016Brexit vote
2020UK leaves the EU
2021AUKUS pact

Click any step to jump to it - the lit step is the one showing below. The EU deepens and widens for decades, then Brexit shows integration can reverse. Green = expanded or strengthened · Amber = mixed or contested · Red = restricted or weakened.

The timeline

1 / 10

Timeline tucked away while you test yourself. Close the quiz to bring it back.

1952

What happened. The European Coal and Steel Community formed with six founding members.

What it shows. The first step toward European integration. ECSC formed

1957

What happened. The Treaty of Rome established the European Economic Community, a common market.

What it shows. Integration deepening beyond coal and steel. Treaty of Rome

1992

What happened. The Maastricht Treaty created the European Union and the framework for the euro.

What it shows. A leap from economic community to political union. Maastricht creates EU

1999-2002

What happened. The euro launched electronically in 1999 and as cash in 2002, now used by twenty members.

What it shows. A shared currency removing a core state power. Euro launched

2004

What happened. Ten states, mostly former Soviet-bloc, joined the EU in its largest enlargement.

What it shows. Widening integration across the old divide. Eastern enlargement

2007

What happened. Bulgaria and Romania joined, but work rights elsewhere were delayed until 2014.

What it shows. Enlargement tempered by resistance to migration. Bulgaria and Romania

2009

What happened. The Treaty of Lisbon expanded qualified majority voting, cutting national vetoes.

What it shows. Deepening at the expense of state sovereignty. Lisbon expands QMV

2016

What happened. Brexit: 51.9% of UK voters chose to leave the EU, the only state to do so.

What it shows. Sovereignty overriding integration - a major setback. Brexit vote

2020

What happened. The UK formally left the EU in January 2020, an economic blow to the bloc.

What it shows. Regional integration proving reversible. UK leaves the EU

2021

What happened. AUKUS, an Australia-UK-US security pact, centred on nuclear submarines to counter China.

What it shows. A new security regionalism beyond the EU model. AUKUS pact

Roll up and down: use the arrows, scroll or swipe inside the box, the up and down keys, or click any step in the arc above.

The account: what changed?

For sixty years the European story was one direction: deeper (Rome, Maastricht, the euro, Lisbon) and wider (the 2004 and 2007 enlargements). Integration looked like a one-way ratchet.

Brexit broke that assumption - a major member left, proving integration can reverse. Meanwhile AUKUS shows regionalism continuing in a different, security-based form outside the EU, so the picture is mixed rather than simply stalling.

The judgement line: Regional integration has deepened dramatically in Europe and is spreading into new security forms (AUKUS), but Brexit proved it is reversible and contested - so integration is neither inevitable nor finished, it advances where states see gains and retreats where sovereignty bites.
Turn it into an essay: which dates argue which way

The same events split by side. Build each paragraph around one point from each column, then judge.

Integration is deepening

  • Rome (1957) and Maastricht (1992) moved from market to political union.
  • The euro handed monetary policy to a supranational bank.
  • 2004 enlargement widened the EU across the former Soviet bloc.
  • Lisbon (2009) expanded majority voting and cut national vetoes.

Integration is stalling

  • Brexit (2016-20) - a major member left, proving integration reversible.
  • Bulgaria and Romania (2007) faced delayed work rights - resistance to free movement.
  • AUKUS (2021) shows states preferring looser security blocs to EU-style union.
  • Enlargement has slowed and sovereignty concerns have grown.

Treat the EU as the deepest case of integration and Brexit as the proof it can reverse, then judge whether regionalism overall is advancing or fragmenting.

Quick check: ten questions
Question 1 / 10Score 0
Use it in the 30-marker

For "is regionalism deepening?", set the EU's deepening and widening (Rome to Lisbon) against Brexit and looser blocs (AUKUS), then judge whether integration is inevitable or conditional.

Use the EU as your supranational example and AUKUS as intergovernmental - that contrast in type, not just degree, earns AO2.

Compare the regional blocs side by side.
Open the organisations chart →