Two grids on the same template. The first is empty - print it, fill in each cell with a one-line note while you revise. The second is a worked example to check yourself against.
Each cell asks one question: does this row strengthen the column quality (mark +) or weaken it (mark -)? Then add a one-line note saying why. The plus and minus columns are deliberately not pre-printed - your judgement is the work.
| Mechanism+ - | Independent of the whips | Forces ministers to answer | Changes policy or law | Media visibility | Backbenchers empowered | Improved since 2010 | Effective overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMQs | |||||||
| Urgent Questions |
|||||||
| Select committees |
|||||||
| Public Bill Committees |
|||||||
| House of Lords |
|||||||
| Backbench rebellions |
| Mechanism+ - | Independent of the whips | Forces ministers to answer | Changes policy or law | Media visibility | Backbenchers empowered | Improved since 2010 | Effective overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMQs | -Planted softball questions from the government benches. | -The PM rarely answers the question; the format rewards soundbites. | -Theatre, not policy. | +The most-watched event of the parliamentary week. | -One question each, no follow-up; the Leader of the Opposition gets six. | -The format is unchanged. | -Accountability theatre - visibility without answers. |
| Urgent Questions |
+Granted by the Speaker, not the whips - Bercow's expansion from 2010. | +A minister must come to the despatch box that day. | -Produces answers, not amendments. | +Puts the issue of the moment on the same day's news. | +Any MP can apply. | +Around 250 granted in 2010-15; over 600 in 2019-24. | +The sharpest day-to-day accountability tool. |
| Select committees |
+Chairs elected by secret ballot of the whole House since Wright 2010. | +Ministers and officials must appear and answer on the record. | -Around two-thirds of significant recommendations are not implemented. | +Windrush and the mini-budget hearings led the news. | +Committee careers now rival ministerial ones - chairs are elected and paid. | +The Wright reforms transformed committee independence. | +The strongest sustained scrutiny the Commons does. |
| Public Bill Committees |
-Whipped and partisan; membership reflects party balance. | -Ministers defend the bill; they are not on trial. | -Nearly all successful amendments are the government's own. | -Almost no coverage. | -Backbenchers follow the whip. | -Untouched by the Wright reforms. | -The weakest link in the scrutiny chain. |
| House of Lords |
+No government majority, many crossbenchers, no re-election pressure. | +Ministers answer in the chamber, and defeats force the Commons to think again. | +Regular amendments - the 2015 tax credits defeat forced a government retreat. | -Low public profile. | -A revising chamber, not a backbench platform. | -Powers and conventions unchanged. | +The most consistent source of legislative amendment. |
| Backbench rebellions |
+A rebellion is by definition the whips' failure. | +Governments negotiate before losing - the threat does the work. | +Spring 2025: the government retreated on the deepest welfare cuts after backbench rebellion. | +Rebellion counts lead the bulletins. | +Pure backbench power. | +Rebellions have risen in every parliament since 2001. | +When the majority is small, the decisive constraint. |