💾 Save as PDF
🏠 Home
Politics Panther · Paper 3 Global · Detailed teaching notes

Paper 3 Global · Environment

The post-Stockholm regime, COP outcomes through to Baku, and ten detailed recent examples (including the Russia protests).

What the spec asks

The Edexcel 9PL0 Paper 3 Global Politics specification places the environment at the heart of two strands: Global Governance: Environmental, and the cross-cutting questions about sovereignty, north-south inequality and the role of non-state actors. The marking is, in practice, an essay about how a regime built on voluntary national pledges responds to a problem whose physics ignores borders.

Spec link. 9PL0 Paper 3 Global, Section B: Global Governance - Environmental. Connects to Section A on sovereignty, globalisation, and the state.

The international environmental framework

The instruments that anchor the regime, with the strength / weakness students need to evaluate:

Agreement / BodyYearHeadline commitmentStrength / weakness
UN Conference on the Human Environment (Stockholm)1972First UN conference to make the environment a global concern; led to UNEP.Foundational and norm-shaping; produced no binding obligations.
Brundtland Report · Our Common Future1987Defines “sustainable development” - meeting the needs of the present without compromising future generations.The vocabulary every subsequent treaty uses; unenforceable on its own.
Earth Summit (Rio)1992Produced the UNFCCC (climate), the CBD (biodiversity), Agenda 21 and the Rio Declaration.Created the architecture; left the targets to later COPs.
Montreal Protocol1987Phased out CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances. Universal ratification.The single most successful environmental treaty: the ozone layer is on track to recover by 2066. Use it as the “it can work” counter-example.
Kyoto Protocol1997 (in force 2005)First binding emissions targets, applied only to Annex I (developed) states.US never ratified; Canada withdrew (2011). Common-but-differentiated responsibilities became a structural fault line.
Paris Agreement (COP21)2015 (in force 2016)Limit warming to well below 2°C, pursuing 1.5°C; delivered through Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) updated every five years.197 parties. Binding process, non-binding targets. The defining current instrument and the centre of any 2024-2026 essay.
Glasgow Climate Pact (COP26)2021Phase-down of unabated coal; first explicit reference to fossil fuels in a COP outcome.Language softened from “phase-out” at India’s insistence in the closing plenary - a textbook sovereignty / equity moment.
Sharm el-Sheikh (COP27)2022Loss and Damage Fund agreed in principle, after 30 years of small-island state advocacy.Initial pledges <$700m. Operational details deferred to COP28.
Dubai (COP28)2023First-ever COP text calling for “transitioning away from fossil fuels”. Loss and Damage Fund operationalised.Hosted by the UAE, chaired by the head of ADNOC; revealed the political economy of the regime.
Baku (COP29)2024New Collective Quantified Goal: $300bn / year in climate finance from developed to developing countries by 2035 (up from $100bn).Rejected as “an insult” by India and the Africa Group, who demanded $1.3 trillion.
Belem (COP30)Nov 2025Brazil-hosted; key test of NDC submissions for 2035 targets.First COP after US re-withdrawal from Paris.
UN Convention on Biological Diversity1992Three goals: conservation, sustainable use, fair benefit sharing.Kunming-Montreal Framework (Dec 2022) added the 30-by-30 target. US is not a party.
UN High Seas Treaty (BBNJ)2023 (signed)First binding treaty on biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction; covers 64% of the ocean.Needs 60 ratifications to enter into force; passed 50 in early 2026.
UN General Assembly resolution 76/3002022Recognises a clean, healthy and sustainable environment as a human right.Non-binding; influential at regional courts (see KlimaSeniorinnen 2024).

Detailed recent examples (2022 - 2026)

The post-Paris years are unusually example-rich for an A-level essay. Below are the best ones for marking purposes - chosen to span states, IGOs, NGOs, courts and citizen movements.

1. KlimaSeniorinnen v Switzerland (April 2024)

ECtHR · environmental rights as human rights

2,500 elderly Swiss women won at the ECtHR on the grounds that Switzerland’s climate policy was inadequate to protect them from heatwaves. First binding international human rights judgment on climate inaction. Sets a precedent across all 46 Council of Europe states.

How to use it. The clearest recent illustration that the human rights regime can be used to enforce environmental obligations a state has chosen not to take seriously - regional governance succeeding where global governance hesitates.

2. The Loss and Damage Fund (COP27 - COP28)

Climate justice · north-south politics

For more than three decades, small island states (AOSIS) and the V20 group of climate-vulnerable countries demanded compensation for climate impacts they did not cause. The Sharm el-Sheikh COP (2022) finally agreed the fund in principle. COP28 (December 2023) made it operational, with $700m pledged by donor states and the World Bank confirmed as interim host.

How to use it. Symbolic shift in liability politics; pledged amounts are still less than 0.2% of estimated annual loss-and-damage costs. Use as evidence both that the regime evolves under sustained NGO and small-state pressure, and that great-power capture of dollar amounts limits real impact.

3. Russia · the Shiyes landfill protests (2018 - 2020)

Civil society in a closed political system

In a remote area of Arkhangelsk region, plans to construct a massive landfill receiving Moscow’s waste triggered a sustained civil-society response - long-term protest camps, regional petitions, and thousands of participants despite the location. The project was cancelled in 2020.

How to use it. Evidence that environmental civil society can succeed in Russia, but only on issues the centre is willing to read as local rather than strategic. Strong counter-example to a flat “authoritarian states ignore citizens” narrative; honest framing notes that the political space narrowed sharply after 2022.

4. Russia · the Moscow regional waste protests (2017 - 2019)

Pollution and corruption · localised pressure

Multiple regions around Moscow saw repeated protests against poorly regulated landfills and methane emissions causing public health incidents (notably Volokolamsk, 2018). Some regional governors resigned, several landfills were closed, and modernisation funds were redirected.

How to use it. Demonstrates that environmental pressure produces narrow concessions in non-democratic systems but does not generate national policy change. Useful for the “civil society effectiveness” comparison with EU member states.

5. Russia · the Kushtau mountain protests (2020)

Identity, environment and elite intervention

In Bashkortostan, plans to mine limestone from a culturally and ecologically significant peak produced large protests, clashes with police, and a national social-media campaign rooted in regional identity. President Putin personally halted the project in August 2020 and granted Kushtau protected status.

How to use it. Use it where the question is about who really sets policy in non-democratic systems. Activism succeeded only after it was elevated to elite intervention - reinforcing the top-down nature of decision-making rather than disproving it.

6. Russia · anti-logging protests in Siberia and the Russian Far East (ongoing)

Economic interest vs environmental governance

Smaller-scale protests have continued against export-driven deforestation, much of it linked to Chinese demand. Regulatory tightening in 2018 and a ban on round-log exports from January 2022 came largely from federal economic concerns rather than environmental campaigning. Domestic activists have had very limited policy impact.

How to use it. Where economic interests dominate and the regime depends on extractive revenue, citizen environmental pressure runs into a structural ceiling. Useful for the realism-of-resource-states argument.

7. The Uxin Banner sandstorms and China’s climate trajectory (2023 - 2025)

Authoritarian capacity · great-power energy transition

China’s emissions appear to have peaked in 2024, ahead of its 2030 target, on the back of the world’s largest renewables build-out (379 GW added in 2024). Coal still produces 60% of electricity. China’s NDC, due in 2025, will be a critical signal at COP30.

How to use it. A reminder that the climate regime’s success or failure is set primarily by Chinese energy-system decisions; the multilateral architecture is downstream of that. Counter to a purely UN-focused narrative.

8. The US · Inflation Reduction Act, then re-withdrawal from Paris (2022 - 2025)

Domestic politics, regime fragility

The Inflation Reduction Act 2022 channelled around $369bn into clean-energy tax credits, the largest single climate spending package in US history. In January 2025 the Trump administration began its second withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, repealed methane regulations, and began rescinding IRA grants.

How to use it. The clearest live example of how a global regime built on voluntary national pledges is hostage to domestic electoral cycles in the world’s second-largest emitter. Use it to evaluate the design choice (Paris vs Kyoto).

9. Just Stop Oil and the limits of disruptive protest (UK, 2022 - 2024)

NGOs and tactical innovation

JSO ran more than 350 actions between 2022 and 2024, including disruptions of art galleries, motorways and the Wimbledon final. Polling at the 2024 General Election suggested the campaign moved Green Party voting intention by less than 0.5%. Following the Public Order Act 2023 and the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, sentences for protest-related offences rose sharply.

How to use it. Useful for the “protest vs voting” debate (Paper 1 Democracy) and for the question of whether NGO disruption produces policy change or backlash.

10. Pacific Climate Litigation · Vanuatu and the ICJ Advisory Opinion (2023 - 2025)

Small states · international courts

UN General Assembly resolution 77/276 (March 2023) - led by Vanuatu - asked the ICJ for an advisory opinion on states’ obligations to protect the climate system. Hearings in December 2024; opinion delivered July 2025. The ruling held that states have binding obligations under existing law to prevent significant climate harm.

How to use it. The clearest example of the “David vs Goliath” potential of small-state coalitions plus international courts. Strong evidence for both the resilience and the limits of multilateralism.

Effectiveness debate · AO3 framing

The 2025 ER on Paper 3 Global notes that the strongest essays argue clearly that the post-Paris regime is “simultaneously the most ambitious and the most fragile in environmental history”. Three workable lines of argument:

Synoptic link. The KlimaSeniorinnen judgment links Environment to Human Rights; the Russia protest cases link Environment to questions of state capacity; the Pacific litigation links Environment to International Law and the role of small states. Strong essays move between strands.