This is a 12-mark Section A comparative question, marked AO1 (knowledge) and AO2 (analysis) only - there are no AO3 evaluation marks. You are not arguing which form of globalisation matters more. You identify and explain clear, developed differences.
Aim for three or four developed differences. Each follows the same shape: state the difference, give accurate knowledge of both strands (AO1), then explain what the difference means, especially for state sovereignty (AO2). A bare list scores in the lower band.
Political globalisation is the growth of political authority and governance above the level of the nation-state.
Its pressure on sovereignty is largely formal and visible: states sign up to rules and institutions, and can in principle withdraw.
Economic globalisation is the integration of national economies into a single world economy.
Its pressure on sovereignty is largely informal and diffuse: states are constrained by markets, capital flight and corporate decisions they did not formally agree to and cannot simply vote down.
Set the two strands against each other on the points that genuinely differ.
| Difference | Political globalisation | Economic globalisation |
|---|---|---|
| Main drivers | States, IGOs and international law | Markets, transnational corporations and finance |
| How it constrains states | Formal rules and treaties states sign | Informal market pressure states cannot vote down |
| Effect on sovereignty | A pooling or ceding of authority, often reversible | An erosion that is diffuse and hard to reverse |
| Visibility and control | Visible, negotiated, subject to consent | Less visible, not negotiated, harder to control |
Choose three or four of the differences above. For each, write one developed paragraph.