| # | Example | What it shows (AO2) | Best used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marbury v Madison (1803) | Established judicial review, letting the Court strike down unconstitutional acts. | Constitution; the Court's power. |
| 2 | The Bill of Rights (1791) | The first ten amendments entrench core liberties such as speech and arms. | Rights; entrenchment. |
| 3 | The Tenth Amendment | Reserves powers to the states; the textual basis of federalism. | Federalism; states' rights. |
| 4 | NFIB v Sebelius (2012) | Upheld most of Obamacare and tested the limits of federal power. | Federalism; federal power. |
| 5 | Dobbs v Jackson (2022) | Returned abortion law to the states: a major revival of states' power. | Federalism; the Court and rights. |
| 6 | The failed ERA | The Equal Rights Amendment never cleared the states, showing how hard amendment is. | Entrenchment; weaknesses. |
| 7 | The 2018-19 government shutdown | Divided government and the power of the purse produced a 35-day shutdown; the record 43-day 2025 shutdown has since passed it. | Checks and balances; gridlock. |
| 8 | Trump impeachments (2019, 2021) | Congress can charge a President, but the Senate did not convict. | Checks and balances; limits. |
| 9 | DC v Heller (2008) | Affirmed an individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment. | Entrenched rights; interpretation. |
| 10 | The 27th Amendment (1992) | Took 202 years to ratify, showing the difficulty of formal change. | Amendment process; entrenchment. |
| # | Example | What it shows (AO2) | Best used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The filibuster | Lets a Senate minority block legislation, requiring 60 votes to end debate. | Congress; gridlock. |
| 2 | Senate confirmation (Barrett, 2020) | The Senate confirmed a Justice days before an election, showing its power over appointments. | Oversight; checks. |
| 3 | Power of the purse | Congress controls spending, its strongest check on the President. | Congressional power; oversight. |
| 4 | Divided government (2022 midterms) | A Republican House and Democratic Senate produced gridlock. | Effectiveness; partisanship. |
| 5 | The January 6 committee | High-profile oversight of the executive and the 2021 Capitol attack. | Oversight; scrutiny. |
| 6 | Overriding a presidential veto | Two-thirds of both houses can override, a rare but real check. | Checks and balances. |
| 7 | The debt-ceiling standoffs | Recurring brinkmanship over borrowing shows Congress's muscle and dysfunction. | Power of the purse; gridlock. |
| 8 | Gerrymandering | Redrawn districts entrench incumbents and distort representation. | Representation; reform. |
| 9 | Pork and earmarks | Targeted spending used to build coalitions for legislation. | Representation; lawmaking. |
| 10 | The War Powers Resolution (1973) | An attempt to claw back war-making power from the President. | Congress vs President; foreign policy. |
| # | Example | What it shows (AO2) | Best used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Executive orders | Direct presidential directives (Trump's travel ban; Biden's reversals) that bypass Congress. | Informal power; imperial presidency. |
| 2 | The veto | A formal Article II power to block legislation. | Formal power; checks. |
| 3 | Supreme Court appointments | Trump's three appointments reshaped the Court for a generation. | Presidential power; the Court. |
| 4 | War powers and the 2026 strikes on Iran | US military action against Iran reopened the war-powers clash with Congress. | Foreign policy; Congress vs President. |
| 5 | Executive agreements | Deals such as the Iran nuclear deal and Paris avoid the Senate treaty vote. | Informal power; foreign policy. |
| 6 | EXOP and the cabinet | The Executive Office and cabinet extend presidential reach. | Sources of power. |
| 7 | Signing statements | Presidents note how they will interpret laws they sign. | Informal power; limits. |
| 8 | The pardon power | An almost unchecked Article II power, used controversially. | Formal power. |
| 9 | Impeachment as a check | Congress can charge the President, constraining the office. | Limits; checks and balances. |
| 10 | Persuasion and the State of the Union | Neustadt: presidential power is the power to persuade. | Informal power; limits. |
| # | Example | What it shows (AO2) | Best used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marbury v Madison (1803) | The foundation of judicial review. | The Court's power. |
| 2 | Brown v Board (1954) | Ended segregated schooling, a landmark of civil rights and judicial activism. | Civil rights; activism. |
| 3 | Roe v Wade (1973) | Established a constitutional right to abortion (later overturned). | Rights; activism. |
| 4 | Dobbs v Jackson (2022) | Overturned Roe, returning abortion to the states. | Rights; restraint/federalism. |
| 5 | Obergefell v Hodges (2015) | Legalised same-sex marriage nationwide. | Civil rights; activism. |
| 6 | Citizens United (2010) | Allowed unlimited independent political spending as free speech. | Rights; money in politics. |
| 7 | SFFA v Harvard (2023) | Struck down race-conscious university admissions (affirmative action). | Civil rights; the Court's direction. |
| 8 | DC v Heller (2008) | Affirmed an individual right to bear arms. | Rights; interpretation. |
| 9 | The Barrett appointment (2020) | Confirmed days before an election, fuelling the politicisation debate. | Appointments; politicisation. |
| 10 | Bush v Gore (2000) | The Court effectively decided a presidential election. | Politicisation; the Court's reach. |
| # | Example | What it shows (AO2) | Best used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Electoral College | Lets a candidate lose the popular vote yet win (2000, 2016). | Elections; democracy debates. |
| 2 | Citizens United and super PACs | Unleashed large independent spending, reshaping campaign finance. | Campaign finance; participation. |
| 3 | Primaries and caucuses | Voters, not party bosses, choose nominees, weakening parties. | Parties; candidate selection. |
| 4 | Incumbency advantage | Sitting members win re-election at very high rates. | Congress; representation. |
| 5 | The NRA | A powerful pressure group shaping gun policy and elections. | Pressure groups; methods. |
| 6 | Party polarisation | Democrats and Republicans have moved sharply apart. | Parties; gridlock. |
| 7 | The two-party system | Winner-take-all rules entrench two dominant parties. | Parties; electoral system. |
| 8 | Iron triangles | Links between agencies, committees and interest groups shape policy. | Pressure groups; power. |
| 9 | Voter ID laws and turnout | Contested rules that affect who votes. | Participation; democracy debates. |
| 10 | Gerrymandering | Manipulated districts distort representation and entrench parties. | Elections; representation. |
| # | Example | What it shows (AO2) | Best used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rational theory and re-election | Members of Congress act as rational individuals seeking re-election. | Rational theory. |
| 2 | Cultural theory and US individualism | Shared values (individualism, distrust of the state) shape US politics versus the UK. | Cultural theory; comparison. |
| 3 | Structural theory and the codified constitution | A codified, entrenched constitution channels behaviour differently from the UK's flexible one. | Structural theory; comparison. |
| 4 | Rational theory and presidential bargaining | The President bargains rationally with Congress to get results. | Rational theory; presidency. |
| 5 | Cultural theory and gun culture | The Second Amendment reflects a distinctive political culture. | Cultural theory. |
| 6 | Structural theory and federalism | Federal structures give US states power a unitary UK gives to no one. | Structural theory; federalism. |
| 7 | Rational theory and voter choice | Voters weigh costs and benefits when choosing. | Rational theory; participation. |
| 8 | Cultural theory and religiosity | Religion shapes US politics more than UK politics. | Cultural theory; comparison. |
| 9 | Structural theory and separation of powers | Separated institutions explain gridlock the UK's fusion avoids. | Structural theory; comparison. |
| 10 | Comparing the US and UK Supreme Courts | Different structures produce different judicial power. | Structural theory; the courts. |